• Burmese
Saturday, July 19, 2025
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The Irrawaddy
27 °c
Yangon
  • Home
  • News
    • Burma
    • Politics
    • World
    • Asia
    • Myanmar’s Crisis & the World
    • Ethnic Issues
    • War Against the Junta
    • Junta Cronies
    • Conflicts In Numbers
    • Junta Watch
    • Fact Check
    • Investigation
    • Myanmar-China Watch
    • Obituaries
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Commentary
    • Guest Column
    • Analysis
    • Editorial
    • Stories That Shaped Us
    • Letters
  • Junta Watch
  • Ethnic Issues
  • War Against the Junta
  • In Person
    • Interview
    • Profile
  • Books
  • Donation
  • Home
  • News
    • Burma
    • Politics
    • World
    • Asia
    • Myanmar’s Crisis & the World
    • Ethnic Issues
    • War Against the Junta
    • Junta Cronies
    • Conflicts In Numbers
    • Junta Watch
    • Fact Check
    • Investigation
    • Myanmar-China Watch
    • Obituaries
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Opinion
    • Commentary
    • Guest Column
    • Analysis
    • Editorial
    • Stories That Shaped Us
    • Letters
  • Junta Watch
  • Ethnic Issues
  • War Against the Junta
  • In Person
    • Interview
    • Profile
  • Books
  • Donation
No Result
View All Result
The Irrawaddy
No Result
View All Result
Home News Burma

Arrests Go On Unabated After ‘Unclear’ Amendment to Burma Protest Law

San Yamin Aung by San Yamin Aung
September 12, 2014
in Uncategorized
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
Arrests Go On Unabated After ‘Unclear’ Amendment to Burma Protest Law

Nearly 100 people took part in a demonstration against the proportional representation (PR) electoral system in Prome

5.3k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

RANGOON — A lack of clarity in Burma’s recently amended Law on Peaceful Assembly is sowing confusion among activists and advocates, as the country’s courts continue to charge people for demonstrating without permission.

The controversial Article 18 of the 2011 Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law originally stated that persons or groups who want to stage a demonstration must seek prior permission from local police, with those breaking the law facing punishments of up to a year in prison and fines of up to 30,000 kyat (about US$30).

However, in February, Parliament’s Public Complaints and Appeal Committee attempted to soften the law, submitted the “Bill Amending the Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law” to the Lower House. The amendment was meant to remove authorities’ option to deny permission to demonstrate, as well as reducing the law’s penalties.

RelatedPosts

Govt ‘Blacklist’ Practices Highlight Lack of Transparency

Govt ‘Blacklist’ Practices Highlight Lack of Transparency, Activists Say

August 4, 2016
4.5k
Advocacy Group Calls for Release of Arrested Arakan Activist

Advocacy Group Calls for Release of Arrested Arakan Activist

August 4, 2016
4.3k
Women Continue to Suffer Due to Land Grabs and Militarization

Women Continue to Suffer Due to Land Grabs and Militarization

August 3, 2016
13.2k

The amendment—passed by the Union Parliament in June and signed into force by Burmese President Thein Sein on July 24—was seen at the time as a milestone for human rights in Burma.

“The amended law reduced the prison sentences, but it’s now more complicated because of amendments,” said Robert San Aung, a prominent lawyer who has defended activists charged with Article 18 both before and after its amendment.

“There is complex language, unclear explanations and descriptions in the Law.”

Article 5 of the amended law states that township police chiefs must approve applications to demonstration “in accordance with the criteria for approval,” but the law itself does not specify clearly what these criteria are.

UK-based freedom of expression advocacy group ARTICLE 19 has said it is concerned that the reform has only introduced greater ambiguity to the legislation, and has not brought the law into compliance with international human rights standards.

“Following the amendments, it is unclear whether police authorities may still consider the content of proposed assemblies when determining whether the ‘criteria to get permission’ have been met,” ARTICLE 19 said in a statement.

“Given the broad range of content restrictions retained in the law, the police authorities are likely to continue to interpret their prior authorization powers expansively.”

Burmese activists are also confused about how the law now deals with permission to protest.

Kyaw San, from the Prome District branch of the Former Political Prisoners Society, was one of five people charged by police in Pegu Division on Aug. 6 under Article 18 after they demonstrated against a plan to change Burma’s electoral system. They applied for permission ahead of the protest, he said, expecting that permission could not be denied under the amended law.

“We requested permission four days before the date of the protest. But the authorities refused, saying we need to ask for permission at least five days ahead of the protest,” he said, adding that the criteria applied by police appeared to be arbitrary.

“In a different case, they granted approval for a protest against the jailing of journalists at the Unity journal, even though permission was sought only two days ahead of the protest.”

Kyaw San said that if the court sentences the five to fines or imprisonment for organizing the protest without permission, they will choose prison sentences since they believe they did not violate the law.

Myo Myint, police station officer from No. (2) Police Station in Prome Township, insisted that the charges were in line with an existing by-law to the Peaceful Assembly Law. Since no new by-law has been passed, he said, police were right to continue applying the old rules.

“Section 3 of the by-law of Article 18 states that protesters must apply for permission five days ahead, but they applied only four days ahead. So, we couldn’t accept it, and told them to reapply,” Myo Myint said.

“But they didn’t reapply and protested without permission. So we charged them with Article 18.”

Elsewhere, however, authorities have given no reason for continuing to refuse permission to protest.

Mass Movement Acceleration Network organized a protest outside Rangoon’s City Hall on Aug. 5, also against electoral change. They were opposing the Union Solidarity and Development Party-supported plan to change from the first-past-the-post electoral system to proportional representation (PR) ahead of all-important elections in late 2015.

“We submitted the permission request five days ahead. But the authorities refused to give permission. They asked us to protest in Tamwe Township, but we asked for permission to protest in Kyauktada Township. They were avoiding giving us permission,” said Myat Kyaw, spokesman for the activist group.

“We followed all procedures according to the law. But they still refused to grant permission, and [after we demonstrated] charged two activists from our network under Article 18 for demonstrating without permission.”

An update from the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP) this week said that in August alone, 13 activists were sentenced to prison under Article 18.

“The number of political prisoners has continued to rise since the beginning of this year, with the use of Section 18 of the Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Act accounting for many of the newly incarcerated individuals,” AAPP stated.

Advocate Robert San Aung—who is currently defending the five anti-PR protesters in Prome, as well as two people in Rangoon who demonstrated asking for justice in a rape case—said the law’s amendment had simply introduced more confusion.

“They should make the law together with experts. Now, the law is applied differently in each division because of unclear expressions,” he said.

Aung Thein, from the Myanmar Lawyers’ Network, said that it was important that a new by-law to clarify the amendment is completed swiftly.

“The authorities are using the by-law for the original law in some cases because they are saying the prior notification is not enough and protesters need to ask permission. While the protesters say they are asking for permission, they still refuse,” he said.

Jimmy, a leader of the 88 Generation Peace and Open Society, agreed that the new by-law must be accelerated to eliminate the ambiguity in the law.

“It should be established soon. It shouldn’t be delayed,” he said.

Your Thoughts …
Tags: More
San Yamin Aung

San Yamin Aung

The Irrawaddy

Similar Picks:

ABSDF Report Finds Torture
Burma

ABSDF Report Finds Torture, Leaves Questions in Killing of Its Own

by Nyein Nyein
March 16, 2015
6.2k

A report into the killing of 35 members of the All Burma Students’ Democratic Front by its own leadership documents...

Read moreDetails
‘Twilight Over Burma’ Tells Tragic Tale of Austrian Shan Princess
Burma

‘Twilight Over Burma’ Tells Tragic Tale of Austrian Shan Princess

by Nyein Nyein
May 30, 2016
11.2k

Movie about Inge Sargent, an Austrian who became a Shan princess, is screened in Thailand, shedding light on human rights...

Read moreDetails
A Story of Modern Slavery in Thailand
Burma

A Story of Modern Slavery in Thailand

by Saw Yan Naing
August 21, 2015
6k

Hoping for a brighter future, Maung Htay left Burma when he was just a teenager. He is now 42, but...

Read moreDetails
Migrants’ Hopes and Fears in Little Burma
Asia

Migrants’ Hopes and Fears in Little Burma

by Nyein Nyein
July 16, 2016
10.3k

Known locally as Mahachai, and by foreigners as ‘Little Burma,’ Thailand’s Samut Sakhon hosts up to 400,000 Burmese migrants working...

Read moreDetails
Girl Who Accused Employer of Rape Faces Charges of Theft
Burma

Girl Who Accused Employer of Rape Faces Charges of Theft

by The Irrawaddy
February 26, 2013
13.1k

A 15-year-old girl who says her employer repeatedly raped her is taken into custody after the wife of her alleged...

Read moreDetails
Did a Golden Triangle Leader Fall for a UN Peace Prize Hoax?
Burma

Did a Golden Triangle Leader Fall for a UN Peace Prize Hoax?

by Patrick Boehler and Echo Hui
January 4, 2013
4.7k

Serious doubts have been raised about the awarding of a dubious United Nations peace prize to Kokang Chairman Pai Sou...

Read moreDetails
Load More
Next Post
Taiwanese Firms Look to Cash In on China’s Strained Relations with Burma

Taiwanese Firms Look to Cash In on China’s Strained Relations with Burma

Rewriting the History of Late Prime Minister Soe Win

Rewriting the History of Late Prime Minister Soe Win

No Result
View All Result

Recommended

Myanmar Junta’s Recapture of Nawnghkio Shows Strategic Missteps by TNLA

Myanmar Junta’s Recapture of Nawnghkio Shows Strategic Missteps by TNLA

1 day ago
1.3k
Chinese Investment Reshapes Myanmar’s N. Shan as MNDAA Consolidates Power

Chinese Investment Reshapes Myanmar’s N. Shan as MNDAA Consolidates Power

1 week ago
3.4k

Most Read

  • Myanmar Junta’s Power Transfer Looms, but Real Control to Remain With Regime Boss

    Myanmar Junta’s Power Transfer Looms, but Real Control to Remain With Regime Boss

    shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Myanmar Junta’s Recapture of Nawnghkio Shows Strategic Missteps by TNLA

    shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Karen Fighters Push for Myanmar Junta Outpost on Thai Border

    shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Belarus Universities Teach Myanmar Junta How to Kill: JFM

    shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Indian Army Accused of Deadly Strike on Separatists in Myanmar

    shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Newsletter

Get The Irrawaddy’s latest news, analyses and opinion pieces on Myanmar in your inbox.

Subscribe here for daily updates.

Contents

  • News
  • Politics
  • War Against the Junta
  • Myanmar’s Crisis & the World
  • Conflicts In Numbers
  • Junta Crony
  • Ethnic Issues
  • Asia
  • World
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Election 2020
  • Elections in History
  • Cartoons
  • Features
  • Opinion
  • Editorial
  • Commentary
  • Guest Column
  • Analysis
  • Letters
  • In Person
  • Interview
  • Profile
  • Dateline
  • Specials
  • Myanmar Diary
  • Women & Gender
  • Places in History
  • On This Day
  • From the Archive
  • Myanmar & COVID-19
  • Intelligence
  • Myanmar-China Watch
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Food
  • Fashion & Design
  • Videos
  • Photos
  • Photo Essay
  • Donation

About The Irrawaddy

Founded in 1993 by a group of Myanmar journalists living in exile in Thailand, The Irrawaddy is a leading source of reliable news, information, and analysis on Burma/Myanmar and the Southeast Asian region. From its inception, The Irrawaddy has been an independent news media group, unaffiliated with any political party, organization or government. We believe that media must be free and independent and we strive to preserve press freedom.

  • Copyright
  • Code of Ethics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Team
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Burmese

© 2023 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Burma
    • Politics
    • World
    • Asia
    • Myanmar’s Crisis & the World
    • Ethnic Issues
    • War Against the Junta
    • Junta Cronies
    • Conflicts In Numbers
    • Junta Watch
    • Fact Check
    • Investigation
    • Myanmar-China Watch
    • Obituaries
  • Politics
  • Opinion
    • Commentary
    • Guest Column
    • Analysis
    • Editorial
    • Stories That Shaped Us
    • Letters
  • Ethnic Issues
  • War Against the Junta
  • In Person
    • Interview
    • Profile
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Business Roundup
  • Books
  • Donation

© 2023 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.