MOGE Begins Long Process to Pick Burma’s Oil, Gas Investors

Burma is offering 30 offshore blocks for exploration. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

Negotiations have finally begun to select foreign investors to explore for oil and gas in the seas off Burma’s coast, but it could be another eight months before any licenses are awarded.

The Myanmar Oil & Gas Enterprise (MOGE) and the Energy Planning Department (EPD) will hold talks with 61 companies that have been “shortlisted” as suitable candidates to bid.

The bidders include major international oil firms such as Shell, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Total and Statoil of Norway.

The list also contains numerous Asian firmsfrom Thailand, South Korea, India, Japan and Australia, as well as China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), which has built two controversial oil and gas pipelines through Burma.

The Ministry of Energy has said the long process is intended to make sure bidders are able to make the right financial commitment and have the skills for deep-water exploration and drilling.

The ministry is also planning to offer sweeteners. These are expected to include a cut in tax on projects down to 25 percent, and a tax holiday extension from three years to five years, said industry analysts Platts in Singapore.

After the long delay in announcing the bidding terms, and given the urgency for Burma to tap into its potential energy resources to help fuel an expanding economy, it is unclear why the selection process may not be completed until the first quarter of 2014.

Bidding for these 30 licenses was due to take place last year but was postponed until April, supposedly because of foreign concerns about MOGE’s murky past with the former military regime.

However, MOGE remains firmly involved.

“We expect that each company will have about a one hour meeting time with MOGE, to review data, and one hour with the EPD to discuss terms,” VDB Loi, a law and tax advisory company that now has offices in Rangoon and Naypyidaw, said in a report.

“In certain cases, particularly for the deep-water blocks, we expect that there is little or no data to be reviewed,” it said. “The Minister of Energy has earlier announced that no negotiations will be entertained with respect to the commercial terms of the Production Sharing Contracts.”

VDB Loi, which also has offices in Singapore and elsewhere, specializes in Southeast Asian business and Burma in particular. It published an analysis report of the bidding process.

Burma is offering 30 offshore blocks for exploration and possible exploitation, but the chief interest is in the 19 deep-water blocks where the greatest potential riches are believed to lurk.

Bidders can apply for up to three blocks. Foreign companies will be allowed to operate independently in the deep-water blocks with 100 percent operatorship, but for 11 shallow water licences they must acquire a Burmese partner.

Burma has 7.8 trillion cubic feet of proven natural gas reserves, according to BP’s annual global analysis report. These reserves were worth US$75 billion, according to the latest benchmark prices for gas, Bloomberg recently reported.

“In global terms Burma’s proven reserves are modest. What makes these offshore block licenses attractive to the big boys of the industry is the unknown potential, which could be huge—or a disappointment,” regional industry consultant Collin Reynolds in Bangkok told The Irrawaddy.

“In terms of the potential benefit to Burma it is going to be a long-term process. It will take years to bring any major oil or gas discoveries ashore, and in the meantime the country is still desperate for energy.”

One of the major changes between the 30 new blocks on offer and the offshore blocks currently in production is that any new hydrocarbon discoveries will largely benefit Burma.

“For deep-water blocks, the state’s share of production—represented by state-owned MOGE—ranges from 60% to 85% for crude oil and 55% to 80% for natural gas,” Platts reported on Wednesday. “MOGE’s take for onshore blocks is between 60% and 90% for both crude and gas, depending on the volumes produced.”

Most of the natural gas now being produced offshore—in the Yadana, Yetagun and Shwe fields—is for export, in deals that were made by the former military leadership and still remain opaque.

Those fields are operated by Total of France, Chevron of the United States, Daewoo of South Korea, and ONGC and GAIL of India.

All of those companies are on the MOGE list to negotiate the new licenses, as are PTTEP of Thailand and CNPC of China, the main buyers of the existing gas production.

Others among the 61 bidders accepted as “pre-qualified” by MOGE include Japan’s Nippon Oil; Woodside and Roc Oil of Australia; Repsol of Spain; Eni of Italy; Petronas of Malaysia; PetroVietnam; Brunei National Petroleum Company; and Navitas Petroleum, Israel.

The most prominent Burmese company on the list is MPRL E&P, owned by Michael Moe Myint.

“Foreign oil companies may bring in a local partner because they are required to, or for other reasons. In fact, for onshore blocks and for blocks on the [shallow waters] shelf, a local partner is required according to the Ministry’s bidding announcements,” said VDB Loi. “However, the local partners are only required at the time of the bid, not at the time of prequalification. That is why there are hardly any [Burmese] oil companies on the list of 61, although MPRL and Twinza Oil did prequalify in and of themselves.”

Formal bids for licenses will only begin after MOGE has talked to all 61 companies on the shortlist, which might take the whole of August.


One Response to MOGE Begins Long Process to Pick Burma’s Oil, Gas Investors

  1. This unlikely practice of product sharing is, perhaps, in an open market economy, the main reason why MOGE, a legacy of the Socialist and Junta eras, exists as a government agency, and the root cause of opaqueness in financial transactions and business relations as well as the personal bank accounts in Singapore, as is given to understand.
    Why can’t a corporate and, property revenue and personal tax systems cannot be employed in order to execute proper taxation, with proper technical and business auditing, and most properly, by proper legislation (and regulatory inspection for mandatory compliance) in the public interest.
    A government that does not play a regulatory role and/or public works and service (health, education, cultural, etc.) is unnecessary and a heavy burden on the national budget. And a cause of misuse and abuse of power and other corrupt practices..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available. Comments with external links in the body text will be deleted by moderators.