Kyaukphyu Plan ‘Lacks Purpose’ If China Pipeline Problems Persist

Myanmar, Burma, Kyaukphyu, China, Yunnan, SEZ, special economic zone, oil, gas,

A map shows the Burmese-Chinese oil pipeline and the Shwe Gas Pipeline at Kyaukphyu in Arakan State, where a massive special economic zone is planned. (Photo: Irrawaddy)

Problems afflicting the oil and gas pipelines built by China through Burma could jeopardize the development of a special economic zone (SEZ) around Kyaukphyu on the Arakan State coast, an economist said.

Energy industry reports say the natural gas pipeline stretching from Kyaukphyu to China’s Yunnan Province is operating at less than 20 percent of its capacity, five months after it was declared operational by China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC).

This revelation, by Interfax Natural Gas Daily, comes on top of news that the chief purpose of the twin oil pipeline through Burma nearing completion by CNPC is in doubt.

Middle Eastern crude oil to be transshipped through Kyaukphyu was meant to feed a new giant 200,000 barrels-per-day refinery and petrochemicals complex in Yunnan’s capital Kunming. However the complex, to have been built by CNPC, has been shelved until at least 2016 as part of cutbacks in China’s over-invested refining industry.

“Kyaukphyu is dependent for its viability on being a transshipment point for energy resources to China,” economist and noted expert on Burma Sean Turnell told The Irrawaddy. “In the absence of this, or in its significant under-use, the economic rationale for the location for an SEZ disappears rather quickly.”

State-financed CNPC has spent an unknown sum of money developing a deep-water oil tanker terminal at Kyaukphyu, which is where undersea pipe links to the Shwe gas fields in the Bay of Bengal also come ashore.

China’s official news agency Xinhua said last October that the gas pipeline had “gone into full operation.”

But Interfax said in a new report on the pipeline: “More than seven months after its commissioning ceremony, the pipeline is handling a fraction of its designed capacity of 12 billion cubic meters (cm) per year, according to Chinese customs data.

“Imports climbed to 56.92 million cm in November, 141.29 million cm in December and 166.02 million cm in January. However, that amounts to less than 20% of the pipeline’s capacity.

“Marketing projections by CNPC had suggested it would initially run at 50% of capacity.”

The South Korean-Indian business consortium developing the Shwe project led by engineering giant Daewoo International is facing operational problems such as undersea drilling, said Interfax, citing industry sources.
The London-based gas industry specialists cast doubt on CNPC’s trans-Burma pipeline ever achieving full capacity throughput without obtaining gas from sources other the Shwe field.

“As CNPC’s offtake [from Shwe] is equivalent to 4 billion cm per year, analysts have questioned where the additional gas will come from to exploit the pipeline’s designed 12 billion cm capacity.

“New discoveries and new developments for the pipeline could come, but so far, it’s not there yet,” Kang Wu, head of Asia operations at Facts Global Energy, told Interfax.

“You can speculate, say it will be filled up. Maybe that will be true, but so far, the development is not concrete enough to say the rest of the pipeline will be filled up soon,” Interfax quoted Kang Wu as saying.

The Ministry of Energy this week named international energy firms as the winners of tenders on 20 offshore blocks to explore for oil and gas, but new gas coming from the seabed in these areas is years off. And the Naypyidaw government has already declared it will not permit the export of any more domestically produced natural gas resources—beyond those agreements already signed, mainly by the former military regime—until all of Burma’s energy needs are met.

The government last September invited tender bids from Burmese and foreign companies for contracts to develop an SEZ around Kyaukphyu. A government outline proposal is for a zone of 120 square kilometers including all of Ramree Island and adjoining on the mainland. An international consortium led by Singapore’s CPG Corporation was this month awarded the consulting tender for the project, and a tender to develop the SEZ is expected to close in November.

A Chinese state-owned firm, China Railways Engineering Corporation, last year signed a memorandum of understanding with Naypyidaw to build an 800-kilometer railway linking Yunnan Province with the proposed SEZ.

Turnell, based at Macquarie University in Australia and co-editor of Burma Economic Watch Bulletin, told The Irrawaddy: “Unlike other SEZ locations, which have advantages for the transshipment of other goods, Kyaukphyu is really just about energy.”

In an earlier interview, Turnell said he doubted whether there would be a great deal of interest in an SEZ linked to a Kyaukphyu port other than from China and its old rival in the region, India.

The Shwe Gas Movement, a domestic rights group, continues to call for more transparency and fairness for local people in Kyaukphyu developments.

“The primary direct consequences of the Shwe Gas project are land confiscation, labor abuse, loss of livelihoods and environmental degradation,” the group alleges.

“Given that Burma’s transition from military dictatorship to a quasi-civilian government is still in an early and precarious stage, some of the abuses associated with this project are ongoing, and new problems have emerged.”

5 Responses to Kyaukphyu Plan ‘Lacks Purpose’ If China Pipeline Problems Persist

  1. You want China to invest in Kyaukphyu. Not a problem. How would China invest if Burma government:-

    i) suddenly declared to cancel existing project that China had invested – the gigantic dam and the copper mine

    ii) the sudden war with the ethnic tribe near Burma-China border disturbing trade and development

    iii) sudden change in Burma national policy without considering existing investors.

    • Don’t worry the earth is huge with many greener pastures. Our plan for ODI is $1.25 trillion at the minimum for the next 10 years and that’s 2,000 times of Myanmar GDP. We’ll find places where our money is welcomed, anyone?

  2. I feel happy as Shwe Gas project turns this way. All Chinese projects are for UMEHL, not for the benefit of the public. All communist China’s projects in Myanmar must stop for good. Myanmar regime is stepson of communist China.

    • All China’s projects are for the benefit of China, this is business, get it in your head!

      We lay the money on the table and we’ll work with your government to compensate and create jobs for the locals. Nobody gets free lunch and that too is business.

    1.before the Kyaukpyu terminal project and relating principally to
    Madae Island – no land confiscation, no labour abuse, no loss of
    livelihood, no environmental degradation, these are observations
    presumably made by the experts.

    2. now we have land confiscation, labour abuse, loss of livelihood,
    environmental degradation.

    accepting this as GOSPEL TRUTH, provide is with a comparison:
    1. population of Madae before Project. current population
    2. total land area of Madae, total land acquired for the Madae
    3. Labour employed before Project ( not self employed fishermen).
    labour now employed for Madae. Type of abuses reported?
    4. Loss of livelihood – specifically what and which type.
    5. environmental degradation – specifically what are we talking
    about, are we talking Madae had 100 Banyan Trees before the
    Project, now we have none – then we had a Golf Course, now we have

    Would you like the people of Madae to return to post Kyaukpyu Termnal Project – might be better if Myanmar returns to post war conditions too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available. Comments with external links in the body text will be deleted by moderators.