US Lawmaker Proposes Keeping Burma Sanctions

Aung San Suu Kyi, right, and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton embrace after meeting in Rangoon in December. (Photo: Reuters)

WASHINGTON D.C.—US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Aung San Suu Kyi to discuss easing trade restrictions on Sunday evening just as a key lawmaker introduced a bill in the House of Representatives to renew sanctions on Burma.

Taking time off from her hectic schedule in Chicago, venue of the NATO Summit, Clinton called the Burmese opposition leader to brief her on the just-concluded G-8 meeting in Camp David.

“They talked about the need for specific steps to promote responsible, transparent investment, empower reformers, and target abusers,” the State Department in a statement, a day after the two leaders spoke to each other by phone.

Clinton and Suu Kyi, the statement said, agreed that the important progress of the past several months remains fragile and that the international community needs to help protect against backsliding.

“In this regard, the secretary assured Aung San Suu Kyi that the United States is keeping its sanctions authorities in place as an insurance policy,” the State Department said, adding that the two leaders also discussed the urgent need for progress in resolving ethnic conflicts and ending human rights abuses in minority areas.

Meanwhile, Congressman Joe Crowley announced that he has reintroduced legislation to renew sanctions on Burma’s military regime. House Joint Resolution 109 would continue the ban on all imports from Burma as part of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act.

“While we have seen many signs of progress in Burma, there is still much more to be done. Too many political prisoners are still in prison, violence continues against ethnic minorities, and not all necessary political reforms have been put in place,” Crowley said.

“At this pivotal moment, it’s vitally important the US carefully balances its efforts to recognize the political changes we’ve seen take place in Burma with a consistent message that far more progress is needed.

“That’s why it is critical we keep this legislation in place and to continue to push for change. The US has been right to respond in some way to the political changes we’ve seen in Burma, but now is not the time to lift all sanctions,” he added.

Each year, Congress must vote to renew sanctions on Burma as part of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act. Signed into law in 2003, the legislation strengthened existing American sanctions by banning imports from Burma, officially known as Myanmar.

In January 2012, Crowley became the first member of the US House of Representatives to officially travel to Burma in over 12 years. In addition to authoring legislation to renew the ban on all imports from Burma contained in the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act, Crowley also spearheaded the effort to strengthen sanctions on Burma’s military leaders through the Block Burmese JADE Act and led the successful effort to award Suu Kyi the Congressional Gold Medal.

Meanwhile, Suu Kyi will receive an honorary degree from prestigious Johns Hopkins University later this week, it was announced on Monday.

Although the Nobel Laureate, one of six accomplished leaders who will be awarded honorary degrees, will not attend the university-wide commencement ceremony for graduates on May 24, she will be given her citation in absentia.

“As the on-the-ground leader of Burma’s democracy movement, Suu Kyi has devoted much of her life to nonviolent opposition to an oppressive military junta,” the university said. “She spent most of the years between 1990 and 2010 under house arrest for fighting for her beliefs.”

Despite her incarceration, Suu Kyi kept the world’s attention and energy focused on her people’s plight, claims the university. The 66-year-old led her National League for Democracy to a majority in Parliament in 1990, an election that the military refused to recognize, and in 1991 she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize “for her nonviolent struggle for democracy and human rights.”

Since her release, Suu Kyi has resumed an influential role in public life, extracting important concessions from the government, the university said, adding that last month she and more than 40 others in her party were elected in a landslide to Burma’s Parliament. This time, the government recognized the victory, it noted.

Meanwhile, Suu Kyi will finally get the chance to deliver her acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, nearly 21 years after winning the prestigious award, at Oslo’s City Hall on June 16. The Oxford University graduate is also due to address the UK Parliament next month in her first visit to the country in 24 years.


3 Responses to US Lawmaker Proposes Keeping Burma Sanctions

  1. The Ordinary People of Burma

    Dear U.S. Lawmakers,

    You are indeed very wise…thank you Ms Clinton and Congressmen in keeping tap on renewed economic sanctions until more democratic progress can be seen in Burma and all political prisoners are freed.

  2. Congressman Joseph Crowley was right spearheading the effort to strengthen sanctions on Burma’s military leaders through the Block Burmese JADE Act before but he would be dead wrong to try to ban all imports from Burma again, especially garment. Garment industry in Burma is owned and run by private entrepreneurs who hire hundreds of thousands of women whose families are dependent on the income of their hard work. Because of unconscionable conducts by activists who lobbied for indiscriminately sanctioning all what came from Burma, those numerous women lost their livelihood and were forced to sell their bodies for living. This kind of sanctions is inhuman.

    On the other hand he was right to say that, “While we have seen many signs of progress in Burma, there is still much more to be done. Too many political prisoners are still in prison, violence continues against ethnic minorities, and not all necessary political reforms have been put in place.” As the facts of the matter, the military régime has done what they always said they would be doing. They followed their road map to democratization and implemented the plan to retain 25 percent of the parliamentarians for military personnel. As the military government said in advance, the winners of the 1990 elections were not allowed to form a government. An international conference in Tokyo by Burmese expatriates unanimously decided to boycott the 1990 elections and asked the populace to do so a month before the elections because the elected representatives had to merely write a constitution.

    If there were changes in Burma now, they were made mostly by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the opposition and the international governments. When she was released from the house arrest in 1995, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi who repeatedly demanded for dialogue with the régime ordered her party members to leave the National Convention. She couldn’t accept the 25% quota for military personnel then and she was right. However, she should be commended for changing her stance for the time-being in order to safeguard the development of the country. At the same time, the US Government is also correct to reward Burmese Government for whatever changes they made toward democratization. We all should be cautiously optimistic about the new political developments in Burma and US Congress would be wise to encourage the reformers instead of punishing them for not fulfilling all their demands fast enough.

  3. Oh well. All the world popular medias are publishing only those few events repeatedly out of billions out of 7 billions peoples on the planet.

    These peoples in the photo are so narrow minded. When they talk loud and wide about economic sanction on a small week country they are unable to answer many questions like –

    “If the world most powerful country commits crimes can others put that country to justices by applying few economic sanction on it?”
    And why they don’t put economic sanction on China with respect to the view of your own?

    There have been millions of multiple standards, bias, information fabrication and hiding, narrow-mindedness, “I and right you are wrong” policies, invading physically and mentally, bullying, and so on for a long long periods so far on this so-called civilized society.

    And the media and west have been creating hatred and division of the population for so long and yet these medias are putting the blind eyes on them or even destroyed them. It may not be by coincident that the peoples of the west are the ones who consume (destroy) the world resources the most in terms of per person – yes including me. My house uses probably 10 to 20 times more materials than average house in Asia. I eat maybe 3 to 5 times more than average person in Asia. My energy use are about the same or more.

    And the west control all of most important platforms (GPS, insurance, banking, computing, etc.) and so the west control life of most citizens of the world. They are the worse of the worse kinds of dictators.

    In fact most of these peoples studied in the co-called world’s best universities. I can’t imagine if our life are any better than the animals’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available. Comments with external links in the body text will be deleted by moderators.