TNLA Clashes With Burma Army as Census Continues

census, Burma, Myanmar, The Irrawaddy, TNLA, Shan State, army, Burma Army, Kachin, Kachin Independence Army, conflict, KIA, Ta’ang National Liberation Army

TNLA soldiers are seen on the frontlines in this photo posted on July 7, 2013. (Photo: TNLA / Facebook)

Clashes are continuing in northern Shan State between the Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) and government troops, as census enumerators try to collect demographic data in the area.

Fighting was reported twice on Friday in Thar Pan Kon village, Kutkai Township, including at 3 am and at 10 am, according to TNLA spokesman Mai Aie Kyaw.

“Our troops are active in that area to crack down on opium cultivation,” he told The Irrawaddy.

He said no TNLA casualties were reported, while it was unknown whether any government soldiers had been wounded or killed.

Clashes between both sides also broke out on Wednesday, he added.

On Sunday Burma began its first nationwide census in over three decades, with more than 80,000 enumerators spanning out across the country to collect demographic data.

The census has been controversial for a number of reasons. In western Burma, enumerators were instructed not to record information from respondents who identified as Rohingya Muslim. Elsewhere, activists have opposed the classification of ethnic groups as overly simplistic or inaccurate. And questions have arisen over whether data could be properly collected in areas where armed conflicts are still ongoing.

In northern Burma, the Kachin Independence Army (KIA) said it would not allow the census to be conducted in areas under its control. On Wednesday, The Mirror state-run newspaper reported that data collection had been unsuccessful in northern Shan State and some parts of Kachin State because of threats from the KIA.

But the TNLA, an ethnic Palaung armed group, said it would not try to block data collection.

“We told our troops to avoid fighting during the census. We let the census proceed in our territory, no problem,” Mai Aie Kyaw said.

The KIA and the TNLA are the only two major ethnic armed groups that have not signed ceasefires with the government.

More troops from the Burma Army have been deployed to northern Shan State recently, despite pledges in Naypyidaw to work toward a nationwide ceasefire accord. The TNLA reported that 40 Burma Army trucks with new recruits traveled through Namkhan Township on Thursday, and that clashes between both sides broke out 30 times in March.

Government troops have also continued to fight in northern Shan State with Kachin and ethnic Shan armed groups.

3 Responses to TNLA Clashes With Burma Army as Census Continues

  1. We have no choice but to keep fighting. We are not going to the Myanmar army but the Myanmar army is coming to us and attack us. What are we supposed to do? To flee away and abandon our people? We we do that, all the women will get raped and our people will get killed. So, do not blame us. Blame the Myanmar Army. Myanmar regime talks about peace. That’s just a lie. Their words and their actions never match. All ethnics must not lay down their arms. If we the ethnics do lay down our weapons, we are gone, and the history will blame on us.

  2. Just leave them alone. Let the Palaungs work peacefull in their Laphet farms. Myanmar regime is afraid of the Wa people but the regime is chasing the tiny groups. Shame on the regime.

  3. – Forwarded message -From: Debbie Tomasovic Date: Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:07 AMSubject: DV reaserchTo: Marna,Below are two emails from Eric Mankowski, Ph.D. with PSU regarding his interpretations of some of the recent DV effectiveness reaserch. He will be one of our keynote speakers at the August NW Association of Domestic Violence Treatment Providers in Vancouver. Thank you for being open to receiving this input.Debbie Tomasovic, LMFTA Better Way CounselingDomestic Violence Treatment ProviderVancouver, WashingtonDebbie,I have been out of town and away from email, so sorry for the delayed response. Yes, you can forward my email. It’s important also to note, which I did not below, that Gondolf’s finding of the 50% reduction in re-assault among program attenders held even after statistically controlling for demographic characteristics, and personality and behavioral differences among the attenders vs. drop outs. The reduction in re-assault cannot be explained by demographic differences in those who attend vs. drop out.Finally, please note that I mistakenly wrote below about the California study as showing promising outcomes in Oregon , which should have been California .-EricOn Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Debbie Tomasovic wrote:I appreciate your thoughtful response. May I forward this and or your follow up email on Monday to Marna Miller? Debbie Tomasovic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available. Comments with external links in the body text will be deleted by moderators.