President’s Office Director Slams The Irrawaddy Editorial

President’s Office Director Zaw Htay. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

President’s Office Director Zaw Htay has publically condemned an editorial which appeared in the Burmese version of The Irrawaddy online on Oct. 27 for criticizing the Naypyidaw government’s weak tackling of the current communal strife in Arakan State.

A total of 11 points were listed on Zaw Htay’s Facebook page which suggested that The Irrawaddy should “try to live in the affected townships for two weeks, develop better relations with Buddhist monks, not antagonize the ethnic Arkanese population, avoid using term ‘sectarian and racial conflicts’ and that the government is trying hard to find a solution.”

When contacted by The Irrawaddy, Zaw Htay said, “It is easy to point a figure at someone but the system has changed now and the title of the editorial should not have been ‘Government Weak on tackling Arakan Crisis.’”

He said the views expressed on his page are “totally his personal opinions.”

As social media such as Facebook is widely used among Burmese netizens, Zaw Htay shot to prominence for his comments before and during the recent Arakan communal strife which started in June.

He was the second person to post a photo of the Buddhist teenager Thidar Htwe, whose rape and murder allegedly by three Muslims sparked the initial conflict, on his Facebook page. The photo was deemed inflammatory by the Information Ministry and action was taken against Snapshot news journal for later printing the same image.

Zaw Htay continued to post lots more information during the subsequent violence, leading many media organizations, including The Irrawaddy, to quote information from his page. Later he removed many of these posts which were considered provocative during the social unrest.

Zaw Htay’s Facebook account, under the name “Hmuu Zaw,” has reached the social network’s limit of 5,000 friends but he also has 20,000 subscribers on his public page.

Yeni, the Burmese edition editor of The Irrawaddy, said, “We are concerned about his comments.

“His views will lead to many questions as he is a top official possessing the title of director in the President’s office. Whether or not Zaw Htay’s views reflect the President’s Office remains in doubt.

“We are concerned about media freedom as President Thein Sein paves the way to becoming a democratic society,” added Yeni.

Critics say that Zaw Htay is intolerant to the media and its practitioners’ freedom of expression. He was also notorious for posting anti-Muslim comments on his Facebook page, many of which were subsequently deleted.

“If The Irrawaddy is allowed to criticize the government’s actions in Arakan State, why should I not be allowed to criticize The Irrawaddy?” he asked.

Yeni said that he intends to report the matter to international media watchdogs: The Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders.

One Response to President’s Office Director Slams The Irrawaddy Editorial

  1. The Burmese Freedom Fighter

    What a good introduction of freedom of expression to Burma in its very first phases of Burma Road to Democracy! I do not agree with a lot of Irrawaddy’s coverage on communal riots, which I honestly believe so bias to Bengali; but I do believe in its right to freedom of expression. All the believers of freedom of expression should follow this verse: I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself.  If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all. 

    Irrawaddy can throw as many accusations as it could against President’s Office Director Zaw Htay; attacking him of inflammatory manufacture in the communal riots, but Irrawaddy itself is in that category in my eyes by taking the most easy shot together with the international self-righteous groups in ignoring the voices and great concern of Burmese people that Bengali are not the only one, but Rakhine also have to endure a great deal of lost at the hand of Bengali in this communal riots. 

    After all, freedom of expression will always offend someone one way or another; thus, it includes the freedom to offend too; otherwise, it ceases to exist. The great power always comes with a great responsibility, but so far, no one seems to share that view of sensibility. What I believe is that at least Burma is getting better and better day after day for that U Thein Sein’s administration deserves a share of that credit and so are Medias including Irrawaddy. 

    If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter; a sporadic experience of hard reality of present Burma; from which, it is trying its best to get out of through its reform process to democracy. 

    The Burmese Freedom Fighter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available. Comments with external links in the body text will be deleted by moderators.