Burma’s Parliament Delays Controversial Publishing Bill

A session in Burma’s Union Parliament in Naypyidaw in 2012. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

A session in Burma’s Union Parliament in Naypyidaw in 2012. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

Burmese lawmakers on Tuesday delayed passing the controversial Printers and Publishers Registration Bill, saying that more time should be spent reviewing the legislation that will regulate the print media in a country that has only recently dropped a strict censorship regime.

First published by state media in February 2013, the bill gives the Ministry of Information the power to issue and revoke publishing licenses, drawing criticism from journalists.

The bill was expected to be passed at a Union Parliament session Tuesday, but is now expected to go through later this month, although a date has not been set.

The committee responsible for reviewing the bill agreed on the suggestion of Aye Myint, a lawmaker with the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party, that the legislators should meet again with relevant government officials, according to Ba Shein, a Lower House MP and a member of the Lower House Bill Committee.

“It [the bill] is an important one to consider because it is controversial matter as well, and it needs to be reviewed in accordance with international standards. It is an appropriate suggestion and we agreed to it,” said Thein Nyunt, another Lower House lawmaker from the New National Democracy Party.

Before the final vote, the Bill Committee’ members, experts from the Information Ministry, and officials from the Attorney General’s Office will meet for further discussion on the draft.

The Printers and Publishers Registration Bill was originally submitted to Parliament in March 2013, and has had readings in both houses. It was passed by the Lower House in July, but then amended by the Upper House.

Journalists have not been consulted on the law, and powers giving the government the ability to stop outlets from publishing remain in the current draft. However, lengthy punishments for publishers and journalists breaking the law have been reduced.

Asked whether the delay of approval for the bill had any impact on journalists working in Burma’s media, Myint Kyaw, the secretary of Myanmar Journalist Network, said while he has misgivings about the new law, the delay only means the more draconian 1962 version of the law remains in place.

“We think there should be only one law for the media—the Press Law, which will ensure the freedom of expression for the journalists,” he said, referring to a law that has been drafted by Burma’s interim press council and is also before Parliament.

Despite the complaints, the ministry-drafted bill will come into effect this year.

“We do not want the [Ministry to have] control over licenses to publication, it should be that the press only informs them for registration. It shouldn’t give power to the ministry to revoke licenses anytime they want,” he said.

There is also some disagreement about the law between Parliament’s two houses. In particular, the Lower House wanted definitions of terms such as “media” and website” to be overtly stated in the law. This point has not yet been settled.

Lawmakers have also not yet agreed the details of how punishments will be decided for breaches of the law.

“We have a disagreement on the ‘action taken’ [punishments] section,” added Ba Shein. “When one breaks the Law, it is still in discussion whether one should have action taken by the Information Ministry’s management committee or by the courts,” he said.

The Upper House is in this case insistent that any dispute should go to the courts for a decision.

Myint Kyaw agrees that the law should be applied in the courts as the law is applied to all citizens.

“I reckon the ministry should not act as the court’s judgment as this could bring concerns about bribery,” said Myint Kyaw. “It should be the court that decides for any dispute, but the judiciary system must be just.”

2 Responses to Burma’s Parliament Delays Controversial Publishing Bill

  1. Myint Kyaw,
    I salute you. A Ministry is part of Executive Branch. They have to execute their jobs according to the law. Ministers must answer when Hlutdaw members want answer from Ministries. Information Ministry must be abolished for good if they do not understand what their duty is. Many ministries today are better to be abolished. Especially Ministry for Co-operative still exists needlessly. I was awe when I saw the sign of this ministry when I was in Myanmar in November, 2013. In a Democratic country, government must allow private companies to compete and run businesses under a fair law. Government must not compete with private companies. In Myanmar, government is still trying to dominate in every corner of business. They do not know how Democracy and Capitalism exist for the benefit of the people. As long as government officials go to Than Shwe’s house to bow at his feet every year, Myanmar is still under his rule, and we are still under the fake promise to Democracy.

  2. A people that wants to be free must arm itself with a free press.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available. Comments with external links in the body text will be deleted by moderators.