Kerry to Woo Modi’s India, But Quick Progress Unlikely

US Secretary of State John Kerry. (Photo: Reuters)

US Secretary of State John Kerry. (Photo: Reuters)

WASHINGTON — US Secretary of State John Kerry travels to India this week as Washington tries to revitalize ties it sees as a counterbalance to China’s rising power, but rapid progress is unlikely, despite the reformist reputation of India’s new leader.

The visit by Kerry and a trip by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel next month follow the resounding election win of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in May and are meant to create a good climate for Modi’s planned visit to Washington in September.

Analysts said it would only be once Modi meets President Barack Obama that the United States may have a more realistic hope for progress on big defense projects, on removing obstacles to US firms’ participation in India’s nuclear power industry, and for firmer statements of shared interests in Asia.

In a speech in Washington on Monday, Kerry said it was “a potentially transformative moment” for the US-India partnership, which had “not yet always fully blossomed.”

He reiterated Obama’s support for India’s bid for a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council and added:

“This is the moment to transform our strategic partnership into an historical partnership that honors our places as great powers and great democracies.”

Four years ago, Obama declared the US-India relationship would be “one of the defining partnerships of the 21st century” and last week the State Department called it one of “enormous strategic importance.”

But while the two countries are in many ways natural allies, as big democracies with shared concerns about Islamist militancy and the rise of China, the relationship falls far short of Obama’s rhetorical billing.

Disputes over protectionism and intellectual property rights have soured the business climate and India has remained cautious about committing to US strategic designs, given concerns that US power, eroded by domestic budget battles, may be waning.

The relationship took a dive last year after an Indian diplomat was arrested in New York on charges of mistreating her domestic help, an episode that provoked outrage and resentment in New Delhi.

Modi, whose Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party swept to an overwhelming victory after years of shaky Indian coalitions, has yet to make clear how closely he plans to work with Washington.

The potential for tension was always high. He was banned from visiting the United States after Hindu mobs killed more than 1,000 people, most of the Muslims, in 2002 while he was chief minister of his home state of Gujarat.

The Obama administration sought to turn a new page by quickly inviting Modi to Washington after his election, and was pleased by his prompt positive response.

Kerry will be heading the US team at the annual Strategic Dialogue with India on Thursday, and will be accompanied by US Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker.

Modi Mystery

The BJP has a strong streak opposed to Western dominance of world affairs and this meshes with the rise of the BRICS block of five powerful emerging nations, which includes China, that see themselves as a counterbalance to US hegemony.

One of Modi’s first moves on the world stage since taking office was to sign up to a BRICS development bank intended to wrest control over global financial institutions away from the United States and Europe.

On Friday, India threatened to block a worldwide reform of customs rules agreed last December, prompting a US warning that its demands on food stockpiling could kill global trade reform.

The deadline for agreeing the trade facilitation deal falls during Kerry’s time in New Delhi and a failure to overcome India’s objections could overshadow his visit.

The Indian stance has fueled doubts about the extent of Modi’s commitment to pushing through economic reforms seen as necessary to spur growth and attract investment.

US officials say Modi’s first budget contained some positive signs. But ownership limits in the defense sector were not relaxed enough to allow US companies the controlling stakes they seek in joint ventures, which will make them reluctant to share technology India craves.

Nisha Biswal, US assistant secretary of state for South Asia, spoke this month of the US desire for Indian growth and its greater involvement in Southeast and East Asia, where China’s territorial claims have caused increasing alarm.

India, which for decades had close military links with the Soviet Union while leading the world non-aligned movement, is cautious about being too closely associated with US strategic policy, not least because of its economic links with China.

3 Responses to Kerry to Woo Modi’s India, But Quick Progress Unlikely

  1. The US-India partnership has always been an elusive goal.
    This report misleads by stating that the BJP ALONE has “a strong streak of opposition to Western dominance in world affairs.” Given the West’s historical record of imperialism and colonialism, does the writer know of any Asian or African nation that would love dominance by any power?

    Ina a fair and equal partnership, as in any marriage, there has to be give and take. The misfortune in a mismatch is that the dominant partner’s actions are always based on what is in its best interest.

  2. US should counterbalance with India to China is a good sign with Burma for strategic reason. geographically India, Burma and China are connected each other, so US has to concentrate Burma on energy sector. Daewoo International company is engaged in Oil and gas sector in Burma and in which India has 33.3333 percent share holding in Dawoo company. As such situation US has to counter balance so that China cannot come easily to Bay of Bangal sea port such as Kyauk-pyu for the sake of China share for gas pipe line from Yunan to Kyauk-pyu on security reasons. As India signed to develop Akyab port under Kaladan River Development Project, India has to protect her interest and cannot effort to allow China easily come to Bay of Bangal.

    During IIWW, Kyauk-pyu was the center of allied forces in which Indian army head quarters was in Kyauk-pyu, so it is very important for India to keep in touch with Arakan ports. Therefore US can not just let go the chances of having close relation with India for long run. Now is the time US has to be close friend with India for the sake of counterbalance to China in every expect especially China growing power in this region.

  3. India a Muslim Country, Quranic Democracy, Colonized by Briton
    Colonialist Created Dis-Unity (Hindu/Muslim) Instead of giving The Country to Muslim
    Created Pakistan
    What a Master Stroke…….
    There are many Butchers:
    Hitler Crime Against Humanity Killed Jews
    Truman Crime Against Humanity Bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki
    Sharon Crime Against Humanity Killed Palestinian
    Milocivik Crime Against Humanity Killed Bosnian Muslim
    Modi Crime Against Humanity Killed Muslim Gujarat/India
    Thein Sein Crime Against Humanity Killed Muslim / Burma
    Natayahu Crime Against Humanity Killed Palestinian
    All in The Name of Democracy
    The World has Elected and Accommodate ……. Modi, Thein Sein
    and Natayahu
    What a Farce…….
    Justice Prevail!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available. Comments with external links in the body text will be deleted by moderators.